Needed Change in Education Research

Tom Vander Ark’s recent blogpost on next generation research was spot-on. New research models need to be used in an unprecedented era of innovation. It takes a long time to arrange randomized trials and wait to publish them. These delays discourage the use of innovative methods and technologies. Short-cycle experiments can lead to faster results and provide actionable data for teachers. We should support teachers in the use of these new models. As Vander Ark put it:

“Traditional methodologies, including Randomized Controlled Trials, are useful for accurately identifying attributable effects of interventions in stable environments. Unfortunately, that doesn’t apply too much in this category. We’re in one big design phase — designing learning tools, experiences, and environments. That suggests short cycle directional research focused on improvement and innovation and conducted in conjunction with product development. I’ve suggested that helping teachers find and create their own short-cycle experiments could lead to improved efficacy.”

Have you implemented short-cycle experiments in your classrooms? Share your research design and results with us!

Trackback from your site.

George Rislov

George Rislov is senior marketing manager at Compass Learning, and was formerly the chief architect for the social studies department. George taught middle school, high school, community college, and university courses in the Dallas area before he came to Austin to work for the Texas Education Agency, where he served as managing director of the division of curriculum. George has served as president of the Texas Council for the Social Studies, and in 2000 was selected to be one of four Southwest Region trainers for the new AP World History course by the College Board. He has been at Compass Learning since July of 2007. He is owned by two totally spoiled Boston Terriers, Zac and Django.